Burkina Faso - Suivi et évaluation communautaires pour une meilleure prestation des services de santé et d'éducation - Enquête initiale (2011-2012)
ID de référence | BFA-ISSP-CMEHESD-2011-2012 |
Année | 2011 - 2012 |
Pays | Burkina Faso |
Producteur(s) |
Institut supérieur des sciences de la population (ISSP) - Université de Ouagadougou Michael Gilligan - New York University Radu Ban - Gates Foundation Catherine Gamper - Organisation for |
Bailleur(s) | World Bank - - Japan Social Development Fund - JSDF - Luxemburg Poverty Reduction Partnership - LPRP - Bank-Netherlands Partnership Program - BNPP - |
Collection(s) | |
Métadonnées | Documentation au format PDF |
Créé le
Oct 09, 2019
Dernière modification
Oct 09, 2019
Affichage par page
310717
Collecte des données
Dates de la collecte des données
Début | Fin | Cycle |
---|---|---|
2011-06 | 2012-03 | N/A |
Mode de collecte de données
Interview face à face [f2f]
Notes sur la collecte des données
The impact evalution includes behavioral "lab-in-field" experiments, which measures the following concepts:
Risk preferences: to measure risk preferences researchers asked respondents to choose between five lotteries, each with two possible outcomes. A high numbered lottery indicates increased risk.
Patience: The team measured patience in a discount rate activity by offering the subjects a choice of receiving an amount on the day of the games or to opt for a larger amount to be disbursed in three days. Each subject was presented with six different scenarios, with a higher number indicating a higher level of patience required.
Trust and trustworthiness: The team used the standard trust game protocol (Berg, Dickhaut and McCabe, 1995) to measure trust and trustworthiness. First, subjects were randomly divided into a group of senders and a group of receivers. The senders were endowed with 300 francs. In the first round senders were asked how many coins they wanted to send to their receiver, knowing that we would triple that amount and that in the second round their receiver would decide how much to return to their sender. The sent money measured trust, while returned money measured trustworthiness.
Altruism: The participants were endowed with 300 francs. Researchers asked the subjects to decide if they would like to donate to a needy family. Before the subject played the altruism game he or she randomly drew a card from a bag. The card determined whether their donation would go to a needy family in their village or to a needy family in another village somewhere else in Burkina Faso.
Willingness to donate to public good: The final game was a public goods game similar to the one described in Barrett (2005). The subjects made a choice whether to donate to public good or not.