Inventaire d'enquêtes Demostaf
Information sur la citation
Type | Revue - Women's Health (17455057) |
Titre | Measuring the cost-effectiveness of midwife-led versus physician-led intrapartum teams in developing countries. |
Auteur(s) | |
Volume | 11 |
Numéro | 4 |
Publication (Jour/Mois/Année) | 2015 |
Numéros de page | 553 |
URL | http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=108960214&lang=fr&site=eds-live |
Résumé | International agencies have advocated scaling-up of midwifery resources as an important method for improving maternal health and reducing maternal mortality rates (MMR). The cost-effectiveness of midwife-led versus physician-led intrapartum care is an important consideration in the human resource planning required to reduce MMR. Studies suggest that midwife-led teams can achieve comparable effectiveness and outcomes using less medically intensive care compared with physician-led teams. In the absence of adequate medical cost data, decision makers should consider the substantially lower average costs for three main drivers: salaries, benefits and incentives (≥two-times lower); preservice training (three-times lower) and attrition (two-times lower) necessary to deliver intrapartum care at the level of midwife competencies. This suggests that scale-up of midwifery resources is a less expensive and more cost-effective way to reduce MMRs and could potentially increase access to skilled intrapartum care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Études utilisées
» | Sénégal, France, Italie, Espagne - Enquête sur les migrations entre l'Afrique et l'Europe - Sénégal (2008), |
Friedman, S, Liang, and L Banks. "Measuring the cost-effectiveness of midwife-led versus physician-led intrapartum teams in developing countries.." Women's Health (17455057) 11, no. 4 (2015): 553.